Tag Archives: Jesse Eisenberg

In Theaters This Weekend: It’s safe to say, summer movie season is over

12 Aug

Summer movie blockbuster season always brings big films to theaters, and frankly, it’s pretty much the reason we exist; all year long we go and see crappy film after crappy film, just to catch a glimpse at the trailers for the big-budget action/comedy/dramas that always tag on to the end “Coming this Summer…”. Well, it’s now August (mid-August at that), and we’ve already gotten our Pirates of the Caribbean, our Harry Potters, Transformers, and Captain Americas, but now it’s time for the hangover (and I’m not talking about The Hangover Part II) – the summer movie leftovers, which, much like stale popcorn left in the popper, are sure to leave us with a bad taste in our mouth.

30 Mintues or Less starring Jesse Eisenberg and Aziz Ansari
And speaking of bad taste, first up this weekend is 30 Minutes or Less, the new stoner comedy from the same guy who brought us Zombieland. Starring Michael Cera (I mean, Jesse Eisenberg) as a pizza delivery boy, and comedian Aziz Ansari as his more responsible, yet still immature, school teacher roommate. Based on a true story, Eisenberg gets kidnapped while out on a delivery, his tormentors strap a bomb to his chest and say “if you don’t rob a bank for us, we’ll blow you up,” which set into motion a series of zany events, and no doubt, comedy ensues. However, in real life, the bomb the kidnappers strap to the pizza guy blows up, and ”hilarity” did not ensue that day. Why the producers and director thought this was a good idea for a movie, I still do not know. But as far as the movie itself goes, it seems like instead of handing out 3D glasses at the theaters, they should pack the crowd a couple bowls, and liberally pass them around. Starring stoner-friendly actors Danny McBride and Nick Swardson as the kidnappers, the pedigree of this movie convinces me that it will come off just like Pineapple Express – a series of dick jokes, followed by some gross out comedy, some light action, a very angry and foul-mouthed McBride (does he play anything else?), a bit more action, and in the end, everyone ends up where they started. Case-closed. Swardson and Ansari are both funny frat-guy comedians, Eisenberg can act when he wants to, but when it boils down to it, the premise suffers from a “too soon” stigma based on the source material, and the comedy is just too stupid to overcome the underlying fact that this has actually happened before, and someone (pardon my choice of words) bombed once already when attempted. Save it for a late night on DVD, order some pizza, get high, and contemplate your own options when the dude comes to the door.

"Lasik Eye Surgery" as depicted in Final Destination 5
The next big movie opening up this weekend is Final Destination 5. Now, despite the fact that this is the fifth movie in the franchise, and comes off as tired and trite, with characters I could really have less interest in, who are getting murdered in the most ”is this really all you could come up with?” ways (lasik eye surgery, accupuncture sessions), its not the movie so much I have a problem with, but the fact that the movie was even made, and the title of the film. Now pardon me as I play semantics, but wasn’t the previous movie in this series called The Final Destination, and when you number the movies before that as Final Destination 2, and 3, doesn’t that imply that when the fourth installment comes around, if you don’t name it Final Destination 4, and you call it THE Final Destination, that maybe you’re insinuating that this is the LAST movie in the series, there will be no more of them, hence this is THE FINAL Destination? Isn’t that what that means??? Well, apparently not in this case, and apparently THE FINAL Destination made enough money for the studio to say “Forget what we said – let’s make another one. And if that one does well, let’s make two more after that.” Not to mention that the movie is going to be a complete trainwreck that even these death-dodging kids can’t avoid, Hollywood should start labeling these movies as “Teen Money Wasters”, as they’re solely creating a product in order to turn a quick profit, rather than putting just a little thought and effort into making a slightly interesting film. I would make a deal with Death himself if he could get me out of having to sit through this.

Emma Stone in The Help
And as a sort of afterthought here, a movie that might actually be decent, had we any energy left to actually discuss it, is The Help, starring the ever ubiquitous Emma Stone, who is rivaling Jason Bateman for the “Who can be in the most movies this summer?” award. Based on the insanely popular (with women) novel, Stone stars as ‘Skeeter’, a newly graduated journalism student from Ole Miss, who tackles the sticky subject of Civil Rights in the early 60′s, and fights for the rights of the black maids in her small southern town, rather than rejoin her ‘Southern Belle’ roots. A completely predictable storyline that people who watch “Oprah” and “Live with Regis and Kelly” are going to love, but frankly, we don’t want to see anything this weekend, and we’ll pass on this until our girlfriends make us watch it on DVD. 

Summer is coming to an end, and so are the good movies, so excuse us for being a bit jaded this weekend. That chill in the air is just a sign of dark days to come…..horrible Halloween inspired scary movies! Ugggghhhh…..

30 Minutes or Less

3 May

by brian

Aziz Ansari and Jesse Eisenberg team up for a stoner/buddy/action/caper movie which promises to be a laugh a minute.  Ansari has been poised for years to make a break out.  He spent two seasons on MTV’s “Human Giant”, has had bit parts in Funny People, Get Him to the Greek, and I Love You Man.  Ansari has been on the rise lately having hosted the MTV Movie Awards, a standup special and, of course, his wimpy Tom Haverford on NBC’s “Parks and Recreation”.  He will help Eisenberg get past his subdued and seemingly Asperger’s afflicted acting style.  Once he was considered the poor man’s Michael Cera, Eisenberg has a chance to stretch his comedy legs.

30 Minutes or Less rounds out its cast with the always funny Danny McBride and Nick Swardson.  They are the ridiculous catalysts.  The writers of the movie are unknown in terms of actual work, but seem to be competent to bring a comedy such as this to the big screen.

Now the bad part.  This movie would be hilarious if it weren’t for the fact that the unbelievable premise actually happened and ended fatally.  In 2003, Pennsylvania pizza delivery man, Brian Wells, walked into a bank and demanded $250,000 or the timebomb strapped around his neck would go off.  Once police arrived, they arrested him and left, what they believed to be a tremendous bluffer, handcuffed on the sidewalk.  As television cameras rolled and the images were broadcast live, the bomb timed out and blew a fist-sized hole in Wells’ chest.

If folks see this movie without knowing the grusome inspiration, they will have a great time.  I am actually very surprised this script made it past the Hollywood legal litmus test.  Once moviegoers learn about the unfunny and all too real event of which this movie is making light, they will feel awful they helped financially support the makers of this film.  This is a poor attempt at comedy following a horrifying episode.  If you still aren’t convinced, go ahead and Google “pizza delivery guy bomb.”  Just don’t do it at work and make sure you start running the water for your shame bath before you hit play.

So, Will It Suck?

No.  The movie will be funny.  Ansari will continue his well deserved comedic rise.  Eisenberg’s already built up enough fame equity to come out of this relativley unscathed.  McBride and Swardson have a devoted following already, so they’re safe.  The writers, Michael Diliberti and Matthew Sullivan better make a sincere Mother Theresa biopic or something before their karma is damaged beyond repair.

In Theaters This Weekend: Bird-brained comedy for kids, and the ‘Scream’ franchise takes another stab

15 Apr

It’s spring! The rebirth of everything green and colorful outdoors, so what is Hollywoodbaiting us with to get us inside a theater this weekend? Well, aside from a temporary respite from those pesky allergies, not much. We’re only a few weeks away from the summer blockbuster season kicking off with Thor on May 6, and it looks like the studios are piling on some mid-range movies that will attempt to prime the box office this year.

First up is Rio, a CGI cartoon about rare birds who take to Rio de Janeiro just in time for Carnival. Voiced by The Social Network’s Jesse Eisenberg, Blu is one of the last remaining male blue macaws in the world, and after living his entire life in captivity in frigid Moose Lake, Minnesota, is sent down to Rio to hopefully mate with the last remaining females in Jewel (voiced by Anne Hathaway). Aside from a potentially racy sex scene involving two birds, this seems to be typical kid fare, as kidnappers steal the valuable birds, and during their daring escape, it’s revealed that Blu, after living in a cage all his life, never learned how to fly. In what should be a great lesson teaching kids to overcome their fears and stretch their wings, Rio comes off as one of those middling kids movies. With other voices provided by George Lopez, Jamie Foxx and will.i.am, it’s got lots of colors and cute animals to attract the young ones, but probably won’t be a memorable movie years to come.

 

And the second major movie opening up this weekend, and I put it at second, is Scream 4. The return of the franchise, 11 years after the last one, seems like a fun attempt to return to Woodsboro and delight in the slightly irreverent take on the slasher film genre. However, most people you talk to couldn’t even tell you this movie was coming out this weekend, let alone that they were even coming out with another “Scream.” Returning all of the major players that weren’t killed off in the previous movies, Scream 4 has Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox and David Arquette, and bring in fresh blood like Anna Paquin, Hayden Panettiere, Emma Roberts and Kristen Bell, and in an updated critique on modern teen horror movies, bring in the use of social networking, where the “new” Ghostface Killer uses webcams and cell phone video recorders to document his grisly murders. While the first “Scream” film took advantage of the “Dawson Creek” era hyper-aware teen scene of the time, modern teenagers who have been dumbed down by “Jersey Shore” and MTV’s “Teen Mom” just don’t seem to be the same as they used to be. Scream 4 might be a good ‘ol time at the theater, but in the wake of seven Saw films, it just seems a bit tired.

The Social Network

1 Sep

By josh

When I heard they were making a Facebook movie, I groaned at the thought of another movie based off a popular website that would go straight to video (did anyone see The Onion Movie? we didn’t). A movie based off a website that is essentially 500 million people talking about their day? I all but wrote this off as another way to capitalize on the next big thing. Then I heard David Fincher was attached to direct; now I’m listening. To attract a director with such clout to a movie that doesn’t have a clear plot, well, you’ve just got to trust he’ll come up with something. And something, he did. The official trailer is out, and the story of Mark Zuckerberg and his sketchy rise to billions looks to be the core of the film…

So the big question has always been “how are you going to make a movie out of Facebook?” and despite a really cool user-profile collage set to a haunting cover of Radiohead’s “Creep,” fifty seconds into the clip, we still don’t know where Fincher is going with this. But then the story picks up at “Harvard University Fall 2003” and we get an emotionally charged recap of Zuckerberg screwing over his business partners and “stealing” the idea for the popular social networking website. Now, the whole story about how Facebook started up is speculation, but we’ll let Fincher tell us the whole thing. As far as the trailer is concerned, it’s clearly a Fincher film.

Fincher has a way of coloring his films – Fight Club was green, the “Freedom ‘90” video was blue – and The Social Network is yellow. What Fincher is trying to say with the color of the film, well that’s up to a full viewing to decide, but he has a distinctive style, and it’s all over this thing. As far as casting is concerned, Jesse Eisenberg takes on the role of Zuckerberg, and Justin Timberlake as Sean Parker, the inventor of Napster, and one time President of Facebook, is a fresh site. Say what you will about Timberlake and his boy-band roots, he’s got a knack for taking on interesting roles, and as far as we’re concerned, as an actor he’s held up pretty strong, and has yet to sell out. I’m interested to see what he can pull off here, but with Eisenberg, I’m a bit skeptical that his skittish nerdiness won’t come off as tedious and annoying. Fincher, however, deserves top-billing with this project, and with such a young cast that doesn’t have the clout of a Brad Pitt, Jake Gyllenhaal or Robert Downey Jr., he’s the big name attached here.

 So, will it suck?

No. We’ve seen every Fincher film (with the exception of Alien3), and we are convinced that the man can do no wrong. He blew us away in Se7en, kept it up with The Game, hit a peak with Fight Club, and has been maintaining a steady plateau ever since. Working on a script by Aaron Sorkin, the pedigree on this film is rich, but that only takes care of the behind the camera action. The only question mark is the acting, and based on what we’ve seen from Timberlake in the past, with the supporting cast appearing strong here, our only concern is Eisenberg, who has had minimal experience leading a film, especially one of this caliber. But again, Fincher is the top draw here, and we have no doubt we’ll leave The Social Network on opening night already planning on adding the DVD to our library.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.